Interesting how selective trust works. The same people screaming, “Is it FDA approved?” are suddenly treating the FDA as the ultimate authority on health freedom. Isn’t this the same FDA that signed off on and oversaw the pharmaceutical era that contributed to one of the largest opioid crises in modern history? The same system that approved products later pulled from the market. The same system that has repeatedly been criticized for its close relationship with the industries it regulates. But now, when it comes to peptides, we’re supposed to believe every restriction, every licensing requirement, and every barrier to access is purely about protecting public health? Questioning authority is healthy. Blindly trusting it is not. You don’t have to agree with peptides. You don’t have to use them. But if your argument begins and ends with “because the FDA said so,” then at least be consistent about who you’re choosing to trust. Critical thinking shouldn’t start and stop based on w...